PRELUDE
CONTRIBUTORS
EDITORIAL
ART AFFAIRS
KALEIDOSCOPE
REPORT
LEAD ESSAY
PANEL DISCUSSION
OPINION
LEAD FEATURES
PROFILES
Vishwas Kulkarni
Marta Jakimowicz
Peter Nagy
INTERVIEW
Abhay Sardesai
Meera Menezes
REPORTS
Latika Gupta
Karin Miller-Lewis
Meera Menezes
ESSAY
SPECIAL REPORT
INTERNATIONAL REPORTS
Deeksha Nath
Gary Carsley
Julien Nénault
INTERNATIONAL REVIEWS
Gary Carsley
Deeksha Nath
REVIEWS
Meera Menezes
Gitanjali Dang
Zehra Jumabhoy
Tasneem Mehta
Latika Gupta
Pathik Srijan
Girish Shahane
Gayatri Sinha
Ella Datta
SPECIAL REPORTS
Ella Datta
Vijay Rana
SHOWCASE
INTERVIEW
"The Eunuch is the new Maharaja"

If I was to dig into my past, and compile a C.V., I would talk of a portrait holding three important figures. These are the three important influences on my life. My mother, Nony Singh, an accomplished photographer in her own right, photographed me obsessively from when I was born to when I went to NID. Zakir Hussain, with whom I travelled when I was young - he is my true guru. I have realized over time how the structure of a raga teaches you about pacing your work - for example, I kept switching between Gustav Mahler and Rashid Khan's Kausi Kannada while editing Go Away Closer. Music, with its pauses and silences, holds a lesson for Photography. The third influence, of course, is Saligao - this wonderful village in Goa, where I live.

A.S.: In some of the works in Go Away Closer, there seems to be a tendency to create drama out of visual patterns and their behaviour. I refer here to works that create an effect out of presenting objects stacked in a uniform manner - chairs lined up in regular rows in a cinema theatre or in a room, scooters arranged in a warehouse, gloves hanging limp on window bars. Do you feel that as much as one needs to explore the hypnotic quality that repetition as a trope possesses (the incantatory effect that words can achieve and the spectacular effect that objects can), one has also to be aware of the dangers of it being used in a manner that is formulaic?

D.S.: Of course, there is a danger there. If you are seeing a pattern and not the emotion that I am seeing in these photographs, then, it is something that I need to take very seriously. I would definitely not want my work to be dominated by a sense of pattern. There is a kind of conditioning that comes out of practice, thought, and participation. A moment compels me to pull the trigger and take the picture - I respond intuitively. Rather than consciously, with an idea in my head. Perhaps, too often, we are conditioned to think of the photogenic and the photographeable. Some of my latest works look at capturing that which is not photographeable. And that which is not traditionally photogenic.

How you capture an image depends on your instinct - the way you allow your experiences to shape the act. What you draw on could be from literature, from music, from cinema, from life. As well as from your understanding of the medium. Take light, for example, the very basic element of Photography. I am very conscious of light even when I am not photographing. How it falls, how it fills up a space. Where it lingers. Light in complete darkness, etc.

There are images I have taken recently which have stayed on for sentimental reasons. Images I made because I had to, for my own sake, or just because I wanted to share a view with someone. Myself Mona Ahmed (2001) was born out of my admiration for Mona - the tough life she has led, the choices she has made over the years. Quite a few years ago, there could be no shows of Indian art/photography without pictures of maharajas; then, of course, over time, urban family portraits took over. Now, you have to have images of eunuchs if you are mounting a show, especially internationally. The Eunuch is the new Maharaja. It's amazing how fast certain themes become stereotypes.

For the complete article click here to subscribe to Art India